![]() ![]() I wasn't able to put the codec parameters in the graph without making it unreadable, so I'll try to make it clear here. You can't see that on a linear scale, but it is easier to read exact values. If you look at the difference between la without parameters and la high on a logarithmic scale, you can see it is comparable to the difference between FLAC -7 and FLAC -8. As a linear scale looks probably better understandable, the logarithmic scale is a better representation of speed.įor example: the difference between 1x realtime and 2x realtime is much bigger then the difference between 200x realtime and 201x realtime. As you can see, there are 4 main graphs: encoding with a linear scale, decoding with a linear scale, encoding with a logarithmic scale and decoding with a logarithmic scale. Encoding and decoding were done on a ramdisk, so the harddisk isn't a bottleneck for the fastest codecs. The computer I used was my own notebook with a Turion ML-34, running 64-bit Linux. These graphs show how much a codec compresses as a function of time. Ktf's lossless codec comparison ktf's lossless codec comparisonĪfter much scripting, the first results are here :) Index ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |